Page Comparison

Assists ministries with investment cases, looks for alignment with digital principles and standards.

Likely to intersect with org design, team formation.

Goal: alignment (e.g. clients get consistent advice), clear governance/ boundaries, healthy collaboration

Risk: could too many “advisory services” teams doing similar work create confusion for clients?

DIO Digital Demo: Feb 22, 2024

Assists select priority partners toward rapid delivery.

Likely to intersect with org design, team formation.

Goal: alignment (e.g. clients get consistent advice), clear governance/ boundaries, healthy collaboration

Risk: could too many “advisory services” teams doing similar work create confusion for clients?

MAS Digital Demo: Feb 8, 2024

Clients we support:

• SDPR - 25 digital talent hires

• AT Gen & JEDI  - 2  In progress via X Min

• MOH - 2 Hired talents via X Ministry

• CITZ - 34 Hired Talents via X ministry

• NRM ( 5 Ministries)  - 6  - Hired Talents via X ministry

• SPDR - 4 Hired Talents via X ministry

• TRAN - 2  Hired Talents via X ministry

• AEST - 1 Hired Talent via X Ministry

• PSA - Classification modernization - product development support + hire full team soon? 

• Job Profile approval to use. 

• Other IMIT Branches on Org design/Alignment, role development and transformation

• Applicants through outreach opportunities, such as BCIT Career fairs, clinics etc. 

• Candidates - Coaching and advice for applications & career development. 

• Clients looking for a TA initiative - 'Rapid Hire Program'

Clients we can’t support:

• GBAs who want to use the DT job profiles but do not fit into them

• Clients that have needs but timing of when we run our comps (driven by capacity and CI) don't align

• Clients that need more help with Job Description work rather than talent acquisitions. 

• Clients that would like to do it themselves but would like to understand best practices and/or access resources (i.e. can you share learning with me so I don't repeat mistakes)

• Who just need some additional support to expedite, but want to run their own.  - We often now provide advice.

• Clients who don't agree with our Service Agreement policy, i.e. can't commit to process or time commitments. 

• When we don't have resources to support their requests. i.e. Unable to run another competition .

• Clients who require IT roles, (Or general)  that fall outside of DT Roles. 

• With specific requirements for roles, that require a stand alone competition. 

• Who have larger requests. 

Clients we support:

• IMBs

• Ministry Procurement Shops

• Government Business Areas (direct interaction with Product Owners)

• Teams looking for digital talent for Agile projects

• GBA prepared to run a competition within the rules of procurement

• Key Clients: MOTI, CITZ, SDPR

• Other folks we've supported in the past: HLTH, FIN, EDUC

Clients we can’t support:

• Inadequate budget

• Not prepared to commit time to procurement competition

• Not a fit for our DM platforms

• Not building open-source web apps

• Low-value TWU/SWU opportunities (ROI too low - not worth the effort)

• Not ready to work in Agile (i.e., no full-time PO).

• Clients not doing custom dev (more for SWU)

• SWU/TWU both based on Agile Agreements.  That means that teams have to be working in Agile for contracts to work.