...
\uD83E\uDD45 Goals
\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics
Agenda Item | Notes |
|---|
| General NotesCommunication Strategy: MVP Discussion | Ensure we include provide the context of the MVP for the HAs (whether it is verbal/written). There Emphasize that there is flexibility throughout the agile process . This and that this is not the end-all and be-all. Emphasize that the agile approach will allow us to be flexible, etc. Communication Strategy: One of the problem’s with the last web tool was that it was on an old platform. Therefore, emphasize that this new tool is
|
Project Status | Reviewed Budget, quality, scope, schedule, milestones and risks. Milestone identified as having sign-off on MVP by Jul 29.
|
Communication/Engagement Strategy | Emphasize that this new tool will be a modern, user-friendly tool, based on a modern user-friendly platform. Requirement Classification: Batch upload → CHEFS doesn’t offer any capabilities for this currently. Will have to explore further Killian confirmed that once a submission is completed in CHEFS, no changes to the submission can be made.
Key Discussions New Risk: Kerri’s thoughts: we have to be careful/sensitive with the contracted operators (200+ sites). Kerri needs to see an engagement plan/overall engagement strategy for this sector. This will be a highly contentious /sensitive communication piece - Show the benefits that the new tool will offer as far as improvements go. Crucial to have the HAs' input and feedback. Need to produce an engagement plan for this sector which may have to go to the Minister . We need to allow significant time for this (i.e., briefing note with deputy). Communication Strategy: Make it clear the benefits that CHEFS offer. Agenda for tomorrow. We need to allow significant time for this.
|
General | Killian confirmed that once a submission is completed in CHEFS, no changes to the submission can be made. Agenda for tomorrow’s LTC working group meeting: HAMIS folks will be there; Killian will do a run-through of CHEFS tool; 5 min for the end (pivot) July 27th - Kerri would like to have
|
Agenda for LTC WG - Jul 27 | |
...
✅ Action Items
Reviewers/Others | Notes | | Creation Date 2022 | Due Date 2022 | Status (New, In Progress, Completed, Closed) | Notes |
1 | |
a Samuel, Linda, Miranda - an engagement strategy for the operators. This will include what we need to engage on, who we need to engage with and when.
|
| CGI | Jul 19 | TBC in following meeting | New | Provide a clear estimation on how much work this will require with the contractors. We will need support from SS/ |
support from IM/IT- Kerri to review the Engagement Plan/Strategy
| Kerri Harrison IMIT. Next Steps: Samuel will update the project plan (schedule/milestones) to incorporate this item. |
2 | - Kerri to review the revised MVP and provide sign-off
|
by the end of the week (July 22)Kerri Harrison | - Explore the batch upload use case
| Killian Faussart (Unlicensed) | | | LTC | Jul 19 | Jul 29 | In Progress | Jul 22 – Kerri reviewed and sent back to CGI. Kerri to provide sign-off. |
3 | - Samuel Ramos (Unlicensed)Communication Strategy CGI to make it clear to the HAs the benefits that CHEFS offer. Take the RKL and show the issues that have been identified and what the CHEFS tool is going to do as far as improvements go.
| CGI | Jul 19 |
| Killian Faussart (Unlicensed)
Infographic or PPT? | FOR FUTURE DISCUSSION (tabled): We need to ask the health authorities when exactly they TBC | In Progress | Samuel, Eddy & Linda are working on getting a resource for the OCM component of the project, which will include this deliverable. |
4 | | Samuel/Linda | Jul 19 |
| | Jul 22 | Completed | |
5 | Figure out roughly when the health authorities can be expected to start inputting their quarterlies. |
Kerri’s | Jul 19 | October | New | LTC’s preference is for FY22/23. Ideally, it would be good to have the budget first inputted, and then |
have input the quarterly submission |
there as well | ⤴ Decisions
- Modify the HA working group approachTo revise the LTC WG approach to increase efficiency.
...