Versions Compared

Version Old Version 21 New Version 22
Changes made by

Matthew Hall

Matthew Hall

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • NOTE: No priority is implied or determined at this time - all objectives are considered equally impactful.

Expand
titleTeam Objective: Partners support the CHEFS' roadmap and understand how it aligns with theirs.

...

Team Objective: Partners support the CHEFS' roadmap and understand how it aligns with theirs.

  1. Key Result: Establish a bi-weekly proactive communication process for change management processes, handling of Support Requests, and planning activities. (To do, doing, and done - at a higher level specific to the product roadmap)

    1. Strategy: Regular communications of product roadmap updates to Partner Teams & CHEFS users via a deck presented/distributed at key meetings throughout the quarter.

    2. Strategy: Executive updates (1 per quarter per executive audience) conducted by CPO & PO.

  2. Key Result: Architectural Forum participation rates increase by 20% in terms of people count attending.

    1. Strategy: after establishing demand, we find out why, to present a message that will matter to partners, and why we are doing it now.

    2. Strategy: Grant early access to new CHEFS features to “CHEFS Insiders”.

    3. Strategy: Conduct award ceremony during Forum to recognize a leading partner for their contributions & impact on CHEFS users throughout the quarter. (CHEFS User Impact Awards - “CHUI Awards”).

  3. Key Result: Receive monthly feedback from clients that they feel improvements in communications (before and after)

    1. Strategy: Weeknotes of things that others would care about.

      1. Audience 1: Partner Teams and CHEFS users

        1. (Tactic) Deliverable: (example) We have an updated instruction page for the new CHEFS Role that was added (Submission Reviewer, Read-only reviewer role “Submission Approver”, Write permission reviewer role “Submission Reviewer“)

      2. Audience 2: Executive levels that endorse the use of CHEFS for their Ministries

        1. (Tactic) Deliverable: Executive Level messaging, clarifying alignment to the technology strategies of each Ministry

    2. Strategy: Blogging about form design principles

      1. links to how to documents for users of CHEFS (for designers)

      2. links to how this relates to our roadmap (for executive)

Expand
titleTeam Objective: Partners support our technology architecture direction

Team Objective: Partners support our technology architecture direction

  1. Key Result: Ratify a committed roadmap & project plan (including sequencing & dependencies) for critical CHEFS technology architecture components.

    1. Strategy: Decoupling of Components for improving resilience of CHEFS system integrations

      1. Tactic: POC Tenant strategy (decoupling user management from CHEFS)

      2. Tactic: POC on the message queue / event streaming to replace the hard coding webhook integration chefs is currently doing

  2. Key Result: Measure some value out of the POCs

    1. Strategy: can manage users and roles outside of CHEFS,

    2. Strategy: CHEFS would trust a token that is not a CHEFS aud variable in the JWT

    3. Strategy: can distribute data on a tenant basis through the message queue, only the tenant can read the data. (tenant = the registered app, which displays to the users)

Expand
titleTeam Objective: Simplify the user journey for low-complexity form design & management

Team Objective: Simplify the user journey for low-complexity form design & management

  1. Key Result: seeing a reduction in the level of technical knowledge and expertise held by chefs users

    1. Strategy: Remove the required sequence of steps that are not actually necessary for someone to rapidly prototype a new form.

      1. Tactic: switch to a different form builder that skips the settings step and let you edit the label of the component in context. (Other than changing the label, and sometimes not even that, the default form component settings are often all that is needed)

      2. Tactic: Adding default values to all required fields

    2. Strategy: Fix the visibility of system status, user control and freedom to avoid mistaken actions, flexibility and efficiency of use

      1. Tactic: Heuristic evaluation to inform the redesign

  2. Key Result: Collect new user & low-complexity form maintainer effort & satisfaction metrics.

    1. Strategy: Controlled experiment - new users are asked to translate a specific PDF file into a CHEFS form:

      1. with FormsGPT

      2. without FormsGPT

      3. with CHEFS HelpBot (ie. Retrieval Augmented Generation)

      4. without CHEFS HelpBot

    2. Strategy: Ask power users to provide feedback on efficacy of new features.

Expand
titleTeam Objective: Enhanced high-complexity forms support

Team Objective: Enhanced high-complexity forms support

  1. Key Result: Increased adoption and use of CHEFS API & Custom Components

    1. Strategy: Add new custom components (eg. mapping, look for more in FIDER)

    2. Strategy: Improved documentation about the API usage

      1. Tactic: update the API spec, make a postman collection,

      2. Tactic: make the API Key creation step great again

  2. Key Result: Increased take-up of CHEFS for data and reporting use-cases

    1. Strategy: Enhanced API capabilities

    2. Strategy: add logging to see who is using the API

    3. Strategy: easier way to achieve a basic analytics function

    4. Strategy: shutdown/sunset the manual excel export with the 4 templates, in place of the excel power query integration.

  3. Key Result: Better understanding of the value of Dev and Test forms

  4. Key Result: Dashboard metrics to more accurately make various counts and percentages

    1. Strategy: query of component type use

    2. Strategy: query of Javascript usage

    3. Strategy: autocomplete form profile Ministry

...

Future:

  1. Strategy: something with the Person Credential, e.g. enable login with a simple zero knowledge proof request of “do you have a person credential?” That tells us it is a real person, who is from BC.

  2. Strategy: POC issuing a CHEFS “remember me for next time credential” to allow “person credential holders” to have the same experience as an authenticated BCeID user.

...