Team Objective: Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System Jira |
---|
serverId | d2911bf3-a8c8-34ad-879e-be57beeeb8f3 |
---|
key | DO-458 |
---|
|
Status |
---|
colour | Red |
---|
title | work put down |
---|
| Key Result: Establish a bi-weekly proactive communication process for change management processes, handling of Support Requests, and planning activities. (To do, doing, and done - at a higher level specific to the product roadmap)Strategy: Regular communications of product roadmap updates to Partner Teams & CHEFS users via a deck presented/distributed at key meetings throughout the quarter. Status |
---|
colour | Green |
---|
title | completed |
---|
| Tactic: PowerPoint at Architecture Forum Status |
---|
colour | Red |
---|
title | work put down |
---|
| Tactic: Teams Post in “Week Notes” channel Status |
---|
colour | Red |
---|
title | work put down |
---|
| Tactic: Wireframes posted on Fider
Status |
---|
colour | Red |
---|
title | work put down |
---|
| Strategy: Executive updates (1 per quarter per executive audience) conducted by CPO & PO.
Status |
---|
colour | Green |
---|
title | completed |
---|
| Key Result: Architectural Forum participation rates increase by 20% in terms of people count attending. Status |
---|
colour | Green |
---|
title | Completed |
---|
| Strategy: after establishing demand, we find out why, to present a message that will matter to partners, and why we are doing it now. Status |
---|
colour | Red |
---|
title | Work Put Down |
---|
| Strategy: Grant early access to new CHEFS features to “CHEFS Insiders”. Status |
---|
colour | Red |
---|
title | work put down |
---|
| Strategy: Conduct award ceremony during Forum to recognize a leading partner for their contributions & impact on CHEFS users throughout the quarter. (CHEFS User Impact Awards - “CHUI Awards”).
Status |
---|
colour | Red |
---|
title | work put down |
---|
| Key Result: Receive monthly feedback from clients that they feel improvements in communications (before and after)Strategy: Weeknotes of things that others would care about. Audience 1: Partner Teams and CHEFS users (Tactic) Deliverable: (example) We have an updated instruction page for the new CHEFS Role that was added (Submission Reviewer, Read-only reviewer role “Submission Approver”, Write permission reviewer role “Submission Reviewer“)
Audience 2: Executive levels that endorse the use of CHEFS for their Ministries (Tactic) Deliverable: Executive Level messaging, clarifying alignment to the technology strategies of each Ministry
Strategy: Blogging about form design principles links to how to documents for users of CHEFS (for designers) links to how this relates to our roadmap (for executive)
|